ADNEXUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.
CIK 1226847Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Nutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| HALE AND DORR | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Nutter McClennen & Fish | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 88 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Susan L. MazurLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORR | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Susan L. MazurLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin Procter | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 43 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.47 |