DTS, INC. DTSI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1226308Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Munger Tolles & OlsonFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- O'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- TroyGould PCFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Apr 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Heller Ehrman | Apr 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Munger Tolles & Olson | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 80 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| O'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 35 | 1.19 | 0.58 | 1.70 |
| TroyGould PC | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 125 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael S. KagnoffDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- JOHN J. SUYDAMO'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael S. KagnoffDLA Piper | Jul 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| JOHN J. SUYDAMO'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 12 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.89 |