MARCHEX INC MCHX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1224133Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- HUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMARFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Tonkon TorpFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Nixon Peabody | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Piper Rudnick | May 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| HUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 49 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stoel Rives | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Tonkon Torp | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 24 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew LedbetterDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- F. Xavier KowalskiSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joel F. FreedmanRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew LedbetterDLA Piper | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| F. Xavier KowalskiSchulte Roth & Zabel | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joel F. FreedmanRopes & Gray | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 33 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 1.39 |