Dominari Holdings Inc. DOMH (last ticker on record)
CIK 12239Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2004 to Sep 2012
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Zukerman Gore Brandeis & CrossmanFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- LaBarge WeinsteinFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard Mullin | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Zukerman Gore Brandeis & Crossman | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Nixon Peabody | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| LaBarge Weinstein | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 10 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Nelson Mullins | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott M. MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard MullinFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Theodore GhorraRimon P.C.First linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 16.46× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Tara Guarneri-FerraraSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott M. MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2023 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.71 | 1.47 | 1.24 |
| Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard Mullin | Jan 2020 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.86 | 0.37 | 1.21 |
| Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.71 | 1.90 | 1.66 |
| Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 1.42 | 1.11 | 1.26 |
| Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.72 | 1.81 | 1.02 |
| Theodore GhorraRimon P.C. | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.89 | 16.46 | 0.54 |
| Tara Guarneri-FerraraSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.26 |