SR TELECOM INC
CIK 1223165Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Bennett JonesFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- VENTURE LAW GROUPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasken Martineau | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Bennett Jones | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 121 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.29 |
| Shaw Pittman | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Davis Polk | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| VENTURE LAW GROUP | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 127 | 1.32 | 1.04 | 1.23 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ronald A. Fleming Jr.Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Blake Dawson WaldronFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.35×
- CAREY Y CIA. LTDA.First linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.40×
- Steven E. BochnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald A. Fleming Jr.Pillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.82 | 1.42 | 2.04 |
| Blake Dawson Waldron | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 12 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 2.35 |
| CAREY Y CIA. LTDA. | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 7 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 3.40 |
| Steven E. BochnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 63 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.72 |