INTEROIL CORP IOC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1221715Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- LACKOWICZ, SHIER & HOFFMANFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.21× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Bennett JonesFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LACKOWICZ, SHIER & HOFFMAN | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.21 | 1.32 | 2.22 |
| Bennett Jones | Jan 2008 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.29 |
| Haynes and Boone | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William B. NelsonHaynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Paul W. LackowiczFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- George G. Young IIIHaynes and BooneFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William B. NelsonHaynes and Boone | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Paul W. Lackowicz | Jan 2008 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.87 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| George G. Young IIIHaynes and Boone | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.40 |