TELKOM SA LTD
CIK 1214299Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 258 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Jan 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 258 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott R. SaksNorton RoseFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- MARIE CENSOPLANOPaul HastingsFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Scott V. SimpsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ross KaufmanGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott R. SaksNorton Rose | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| MARIE CENSOPLANOPaul Hastings | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Scott V. SimpsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ross KaufmanGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 |