CONNECTURE INC CNXR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1211759Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2015 to Dec 2017
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Feb 2018 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- COHN BIRNBAUM & SHEAFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.20×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Morris, Manning & Martin, LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Ropes & Gray | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Blank Rome | Feb 2018 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 19 | 2.04 | 0.86 | 2.12 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| COHN BIRNBAUM & SHEA | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 9 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.20 |
| Holland & Knight | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.52 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 105 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.86 |
| Proskauer Rose | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert E. GoedertKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Christopher C. PaciDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Michael D. BeauvaisRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Patrick O BrienRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Samer M. ZabanehDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert E. GoedertKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Christopher C. PaciDLA Piper | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Michael D. BeauvaisRopes & Gray | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Patrick O BrienRopes & Gray | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Samer M. ZabanehDLA Piper | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.36 |