NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC
CIK 1211010Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Best & Flanagan LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Best & Flanagan LLP | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 6 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.33 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JAMES M. LURIEO'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- James WestraHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMARFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAMES M. LURIEO'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.70 | 1.81 | 1.73 |
| James WestraHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 18 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.59 |