Star Equity Holdings, Inc. STRR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1210708Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jul 2025 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Jul 2025 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Gardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & Hostetler | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Foley & Lardner | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jul 2025 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Pryor Cashman | Jul 2025 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Gardner Carton & Douglas | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 46 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Sidley Austin | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lawrence S. ElbaumVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Claudia B. DubonOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Adam W. FinermanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- John K. WilsonFoley & LardnerFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Gregg J. BermanFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence S. ElbaumVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Claudia B. DubonOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Adam W. FinermanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Feb 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| John K. WilsonFoley & Lardner | Feb 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & Lardner | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |
| Gregg J. BermanFulbright & Jaworski | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |