TODCO THE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1210697Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Porter & Hedges | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Holland & Knight | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Seward & Kissel | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- NICK D. NICHOLASPorter & HedgesFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- T. WILLIAM PORTERPorter & HedgesFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Gene J. OshmanBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- John D. GeddesBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NICK D. NICHOLASPorter & Hedges | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| T. WILLIAM PORTERPorter & Hedges | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.35 | 1.36 | 1.11 |
| Gene J. OshmanBaker Botts L.L.P. | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| John D. GeddesBaker Botts L.L.P. | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 1.35 |