SPI Energy Co., Ltd. SOPW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1210618Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Sep 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2020 to Mar 2025
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carey OlsenFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law CorporationFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 2.69× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- Bullivant Houser Bailey PCFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carey Olsen | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 94 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.31 | 2.69 | 1.98 |
| Bullivant Houser Bailey PC | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David C. FischerLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Deborah K. SeoBullivant Houser Bailey PCFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mark C. LeeGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 3.20× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David C. FischerLoeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.09 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 1.21 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Deborah K. SeoBullivant Houser Bailey PC | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Mark C. LeeGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 44 | 0.70 | 3.20 | 1.75 |