Arlington Asset Investment Corp. AAIC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1209028Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2005 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Hunton & Williams | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Zach SwartzVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Dec 2023 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Allen C. GoolsbyHunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- James V. DavidsonHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- S. Gregory CopeHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Ronald J. LiebermanHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel M. LeBeyHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach SwartzVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Dec 2023 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Allen C. GoolsbyHunton & Williams | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| James V. DavidsonHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| S. Gregory CopeHunton & Williams | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Ronald J. LiebermanHunton & Williams | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel M. LeBeyHunton & Williams | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.48 | 0.96 | 0.64 |
| Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2016 | Text search only | 117 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2016 | Text search only | 108 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2016 | Text search only | 110 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2016 | Text search only | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.43 |