WH INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LTD
CIK 1205298Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HANNES SNELLMAN ATTORNEYS AT LAWFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HANNES SNELLMAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Irell & Manella | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
| Maples and Calder | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John P. FowlerWoodburn and WedgeFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Philip L. ColbranChadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John P. FowlerWoodburn and Wedge | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 22 | 2.05 | 0.48 | 1.31 |
| Philip L. ColbranChadbourne & Parke | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 |