GOLFSMITH INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC GOLF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1202273Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- White & CaseFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| White & Case | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| King & Spalding | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Mayer Brown | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory PryorWhite & CaseFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Mark MandelBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Colin J. DiamondWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Mark L. MandelWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- MARY A. BERNARDKing & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
- Tracy KimmelKing & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- John M. ReissWhite & CaseFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Matthew J. BensonEdwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Jeffrey A. ChapmanGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ronald S. BrodyMayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory PryorWhite & Case | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Mark MandelBaker & McKenzie | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Colin J. DiamondWhite & Case | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 83 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Mark L. MandelWhite & Case | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| MARY A. BERNARDKing & Spalding | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 2.08 |
| Tracy KimmelKing & Spalding | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| John M. ReissWhite & Case | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 19 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Matthew J. BensonEdwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| Jeffrey A. ChapmanGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 28 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ronald S. BrodyMayer Brown | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |