JAZZ SEMICONDUCTOR INC
CIK 1200720Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eilenberg & Krause LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Rutan & TuckerFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eilenberg & Krause LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 35 | 2.12 | 1.61 | 1.83 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Mayer Brown | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Alston & Bird | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Cooley LLP | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Rutan & Tucker | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 60 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 1.08 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Sheldon KrauseEilenberg & Krause LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.38×
- Jeffrey C. HowlandWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.55× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 54 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Sheldon KrauseEilenberg & Krause LLP | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 5 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.38 |
| Jeffrey C. HowlandWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 3.55 | 0.00 |