INTEGRATED ALARM SERVICES GROUP INC IASG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1200022Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gersten Savage LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- R. Scott FalkFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gersten Savage LLP | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 137 | 1.20 | 1.38 | 1.22 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Morrison & Foerster | May 2007 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| R. Scott Falk | May 2007 | Text search only | 21 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur S. MarcusSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- R. Scott FalkKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur S. MarcusSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 75 | 1.11 | 0.73 | 1.39 |
| R. Scott FalkKirkland & Ellis | May 2007 | Text search only | 19 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.44 |