ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO LLC
CIK 1193311Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2024 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Locke LordFirst linked Dec 2023 · Text search only · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2019 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2018 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2018 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Dec 2018 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Worsham, Forsythe & Wooldridge, L.L.P.First linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Hunton & Williams | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.35 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2024 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Locke Lord | Dec 2023 | Text search only | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Dec 2023 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.10 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2019 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2018 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.26 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2018 | Text search only | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Dec 2018 | Text search only | 244 | 1.33 | 1.19 | 1.35 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Worsham, Forsythe & Wooldridge, L.L.P. | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 9 | 3.51 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| King & Spalding | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.24 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ho Chi Minh CityFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 346 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Robert J. Reger Jr.Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLPFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ho Chi Minh City | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 346 | 1.08 | 0.73 | 0.92 |
| Robert J. Reger Jr.Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 13 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |