DREYERS GRAND ICE CREAM HOLDINGS INC DRYR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1189712Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Piper Rudnick | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Mayer Brown | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- SETH A. KAPLANWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward BattsDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETH A. KAPLANWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward BattsDLA Piper | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 10 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.90 |