EXOPACK HOLDING CORP
CIK 1186362Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Warner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Jaffe Raitt Heuer & WeissFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoel Rives | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Warner Norcross & Judd | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 60 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Bracewell LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 37 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 1.65 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bruce C. YoungWarner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Reed W. TophamStoel RivesFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- DAVID A. GERSONMorgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.28×
- Kimberly A. TaylorMorgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruce C. YoungWarner Norcross & Judd | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Reed W. TophamStoel Rives | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| DAVID A. GERSONMorgan Lewis | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 9 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 3.28 |
| Kimberly A. TaylorMorgan Lewis | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 7 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 3.06 |