TANGOE INC TNGO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1182325Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Shipman & GoodwinFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Edwards Wildman PalmerFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cole SchotzFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 2.46× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.First linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| HALE AND DORR | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Shipman & Goodwin | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.25 | 0.82 | 1.18 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Edwards Wildman Palmer | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 54 | 0.88 | 0.43 | 0.80 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| DLA Piper | May 2011 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2011 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Cole Schotz | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 17 | 0.63 | 2.46 | 1.69 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Nixon Peabody | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 51 | 1.26 | 0.95 | 1.31 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard A. PresuttiSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Jay E. BothwickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- John A. BurgessHALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- David S. AllinsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Eric WangDLA PiperFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Brian K. BeardGunderson DettmerFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Seth I. RubinRuskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.First linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 2.30× · 95% wipeout 2.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard A. PresuttiSchulte Roth & Zabel | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Jay E. BothwickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| John A. BurgessHALE AND DORR | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORR | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| David S. AllinsonLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2011 | Text search only | 21 | 3.40 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| Eric WangDLA Piper | May 2011 | Text search only | 10 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 0.95 |
| Brian K. BeardGunderson Dettmer | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 11 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Seth I. RubinRuskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 11 | 1.72 | 2.30 | 2.31 |