AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC AUXL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1182129Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & SteinerFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Montgomery McCracken Walker & RhoadsFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 25 | 2.09 | 0.57 | 1.47 |
| Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 23 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alison S. ResslerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Alan SingerMorgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- James W. McKenzie Jr.Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.70×
- Bruce A. GutenplanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison S. ResslerSullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2015 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Alan SingerMorgan Lewis | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| James W. McKenzie Jr.Morgan Lewis | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 2.70 |
| Bruce A. GutenplanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.49 |