HERBALIFE LTD. HLF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1180262Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2017 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Moses & SingerFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- TroyGould PCFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Maples and Calder | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2017 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Irell & Manella | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Moses & Singer | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 22 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| Proskauer Rose | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| TroyGould PC | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 125 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.25 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2004 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2023 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- James J. MoloneyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 206 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jonathan K. LayneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.83× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- MICHAEL MAYESGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 4.05× · 95% wipeout 3.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2023 | Named in a filing | 43 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| James J. MoloneyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 206 | 1.74 | 0.21 | 0.99 |
| Jonathan K. LayneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.77 | 1.83 | 0.74 |
| MICHAEL MAYESGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.11 | 4.05 | 3.18 |