ENDURANCE SPECIALTY HOLDINGS LTD ENH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1179755Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.18 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2015 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Willkie Farr | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Norton Rose | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| White & Case | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard J. GrossmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Todd E. FreedSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Michael GrollWillkie FarrFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Susan J. SutherlandSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Craig F. ArcellaCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Eric L. SchieleCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Paul T. SchultzFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Robert J. SullivanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard J. GrossmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Todd E. FreedSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Michael GrollWillkie Farr | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Susan J. SutherlandSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Craig F. ArcellaCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2015 | Text search only | 43 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Eric L. SchieleCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2015 | Text search only | 27 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Paul T. Schultz | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 25 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Robert J. SullivanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |