AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. FOLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1178879Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPFirst linked Feb 2025 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.14×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked May 2007 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Herrick, Feinstein LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Pepper Locke LLP | Feb 2025 | Named in a filing | 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Morgan Lewis | Feb 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Bingham McCutchen | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Ropes & Gray | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | May 2007 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | May 2007 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Herrick, Feinstein LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 47 | 0.53 | 1.94 | 0.32 |
| Paul Hastings | May 2006 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott R. JonesPepper HamiltonFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Steven J. AbramsHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchenFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Patrick O BrienRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott R. JonesPepper Hamilton | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Steven J. AbramsHogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchen | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.78 | 2.41 | 0.76 |
| Patrick O BrienRopes & Gray | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.03 |