Storm Cat Energy CORP SCU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1178818Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bull Housser & TupperFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.64× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull Housser & Tupper | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.64 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| King & Spalding | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- George A. HagertyHogan & HartsonFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard J. MatteraHogan & HartsonFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David S. HuntFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George A. HagertyHogan & Hartson | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard J. MatteraHogan & Hartson | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David S. Hunt | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 29 | 0.97 | 1.61 | 1.29 |