Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. PRTK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1178711Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2006 to Feb 2009
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2023 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2023 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Reed Smith | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Leah R. SauterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Tara FisherRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Thomas J. DanielskiRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Christopher D. ComeauRopes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- John T. McKennaCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Michael O DonnellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
- Gavin McCraleyMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- Michael J. O DonnellMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Robert F. KornegayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Kate NicholsCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- Peter M. LambOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Leah R. SauterLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.97 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Tara FisherRopes & Gray | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Thomas J. DanielskiRopes & Gray | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Christopher D. ComeauRopes & Gray | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| John T. McKennaCooley LLP | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 1.10 |
| Michael O DonnellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
| Gavin McCraleyMorrison & Foerster | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| Michael J. O DonnellMorrison & Foerster | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Robert F. KornegayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Kate NicholsCooley LLP | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.83 |
| Peter M. LambOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.10 |