ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC ENTA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1177648Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jul 2018 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley HoagFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Locke LordFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in a filing · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Edwards Wildman PalmerFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley Hoag | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Locke Lord | Feb 2015 | Named in a filing | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Edwards Wildman Palmer | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 0.88 | 0.43 | 0.80 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan M. Rourke ReedFoley HoagFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Ryan Rourke ReedFoley HoagFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.35×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Stacie S. AarestadFoley HoagFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan M. Rourke ReedFoley Hoag | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Ryan Rourke ReedFoley Hoag | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.35 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Stacie S. AarestadFoley Hoag | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.26 |