Perpetual Energy Inc.
CIK 1177293Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Burnet Duckworth & PalmerFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Gowling Lafleur HendersonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Macleod DixonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnet Duckworth & Palmer | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.86 | 1.08 | 0.92 |
| Gowling Lafleur Henderson | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.98 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| Macleod Dixon | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 31 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 1.49 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin KeoghWhite & Case | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 17 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.47 |