Rodobo International Inc NVMH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1177274Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Burns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burns & Levinson LLP | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| AllBright Law Offices | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.16 |
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Chad J. PorterBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Dennis BrovaroneFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Stephen D. BrookBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Howard E. BerkenblitSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- David LubinDavid Lubin & Associates, PLLCFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Howard H. JiangBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad J. PorterBurns & Levinson LLP | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Dennis Brovarone | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.62 | 1.40 | 1.04 |
| Stephen D. BrookBurns & Levinson LLP | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Howard E. BerkenblitSullivan & Worcester LLP | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 41 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.97 |
| David LubinDavid Lubin & Associates, PLLC | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 110 | 0.96 | 1.61 | 1.09 |
| Howard H. JiangBaker & McKenzie | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 9 | 2.70 | 1.46 | 1.19 |