ORAMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC. ORMP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1176309Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Zysman Aharoni GayerFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Clark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 204 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Cane Clark LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
| Zysman Aharoni Gayer | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Blank Rome | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Clark Wilson LLP | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 204 | 0.72 | 1.43 | 1.11 |
| Cane Clark LLP | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.25 | 1.17 | 0.97 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Howard E. BerkenblitSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Michael A. CaneCane Clark LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Conrad Y. NestO'Neill LawFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Ethan P. MinskyClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Jonathan C. LotzClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 2.12× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Kari RichardsonClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 1.87× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Vikram DhirClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Virgil Z. HlusClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 1.95× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- William L. MacdonaldClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Bernard PinskyClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howard E. BerkenblitSullivan & Worcester LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.97 |
| Michael A. CaneCane Clark LLP | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 57 | 1.14 | 1.18 | 0.76 |
| Conrad Y. NestO'Neill Law | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 39 | 0.66 | 1.72 | 1.31 |
| Ethan P. MinskyClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 44 | 0.38 | 1.89 | 0.96 |
| Jonathan C. LotzClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 30 | 0.57 | 2.12 | 0.82 |
| Kari RichardsonClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 37 | 0.46 | 1.87 | 1.27 |
| Vikram DhirClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 38 | 0.66 | 2.27 | 0.91 |
| Virgil Z. HlusClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 67 | 0.53 | 1.95 | 1.13 |
| William L. MacdonaldClark Wilson LLP | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 92 | 0.80 | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| Bernard PinskyClark Wilson LLP | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 56 | 0.47 | 1.54 | 0.89 |