APPLIED SOLAR, INC. APSO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1176193Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & RenshawFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- FRASER and COMPANYFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 2.38× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Luce Forward Hamilton & ScrippsFirst linked May 2008 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked May 2008 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Sutton Law CenterFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 2.13× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & Renshaw | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.78 | 1.71 | 1.30 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
| FRASER and COMPANY | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.12 | 2.38 | 0.97 |
| Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP | May 2008 | Text search only | 18 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 1.62 |
| Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps | May 2008 | Text search only | 80 | 0.85 | 1.20 | 0.90 |
| Morgan Lewis | May 2008 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Edwards & Angell | May 2006 | Text search only | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
| Palmer & Dodge | May 2006 | Text search only | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
| Sutton Law Center | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 14 | 1.24 | 2.13 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Martin J. WatersWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 2.49×
- Anthony G. MaurielloWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- D. Roger GlennGlenn & GlennFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 2.85× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- John D. TishlerSheppard MullinFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 3.18× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin J. WatersWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.91 | 0.88 | 2.49 |
| Anthony G. MaurielloWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.15 | 1.75 | 1.74 |
| D. Roger GlennGlenn & Glenn | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.75 | 2.85 | 1.30 |
| John D. TishlerSheppard Mullin | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 20 | 1.36 | 3.18 | 1.34 |