RANDGOLD RESOURCES LTD
CIK 1175580Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Norton Rose | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Fasken Martineau | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Herbert Smith | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Mayer Brown | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven I. SuzzanFulbright & Jaworski | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 1.76 |