SMURFIT KAPPA ACQUISITIONS
CIK 1175423Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Moses & SingerFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- WILLIAM S. KIRSCHFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Allen & Overy | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Arthur Cox | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Moses & Singer | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 22 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| WILLIAM S. KIRSCH | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 14 | 1.31 | 1.65 | 1.46 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILLIAM FRY WILLIAM FRYFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William FryFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILLIAM FRY WILLIAM FRY | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William Fry | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |