ROTECH HEALTHCARE INC ROHI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1175108Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Apr 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2003 to Aug 2013
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & SteinerFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Young Conaway Stargatt & TaylorFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 54 | 0.75 | 1.63 | 1.56 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.09 | 0.57 | 1.47 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Kaye Scholer | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 36 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- David T. Della RoccaLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Stuart BressmanProskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| David T. Della RoccaLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Stuart BressmanProskauer Rose | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.13 |