CENTER FINANCIAL CORP CLFC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1174820Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- King, Holmes, Paterno & Berliner, LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Fried, Bird & Crumpacker, P.C.First linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayer Brown | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| King, Holmes, Paterno & Berliner, LLP | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Fried, Bird & Crumpacker, P.C. | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Patrick S. BrownSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Nikki WolontisFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- James R. WaltherMayer BrownFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 2.81× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick S. BrownSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Nikki Wolontis | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| James R. WaltherMayer Brown | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 15 | 0.46 | 2.81 | 0.56 |