CRESCENT FINANCE CO
CIK 1174272Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Jackson Walker L.L.P.First linked May 2002 · Text search only · 158 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Kelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Thompson & Knight | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Jackson Walker L.L.P. | May 2002 | Text search only | 158 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| Kelly Hart & Hallman | May 2002 | Text search only | 30 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Shaw Pittman | May 2002 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John T. HaggertyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Sylvia M. MahaffeyShaw PittmanFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin Procter | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John T. HaggertyGoodwin Procter | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Sylvia M. MahaffeyShaw Pittman | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |