ENBRIDGE ENERGY MANAGEMENT L L C EEQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1173911Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2003
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Brunini Grantham Grower & HewesFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Brunini Grantham Grower & Hewes | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 15 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Laura J. McMahonFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 4.01× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William N. Finnegan IVLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Joshua DavidsonBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura J. McMahonFulbright & Jaworski | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.65 | 4.01 | 0.00 |
| William N. Finnegan IVLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Joshua DavidsonBaker Botts L.L.P. | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 42 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.87 |