CHINA HEALTH RESOURCE, INC. CHRI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1173784Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Strategic alliance with MWE China Law OfficesFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Lehman & Eilen LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 2.25× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- SHUSTAK JALIL & HELLERFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Emery | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| Lehman & Eilen LLP | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.23 | 2.25 | 0.64 |
| SHUSTAK JALIL & HELLER | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barbara A. JonesGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 3.01× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Jared FebbrorielloJPF Securities Law, LLCFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Richard S. HellerSHUSTAK JALIL & HELLERFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.99× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara A. JonesGreenberg Traurig | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.64 | 3.01 | 1.29 |
| Jared FebbrorielloJPF Securities Law, LLC | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 1.41 |
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |
| Richard S. HellerSHUSTAK JALIL & HELLER | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 0.00 |