CEVA INC CEVA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1173489Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.21 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2005 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alfredo B. D. SilvaMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Bret M. DiMarcoWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- David J. SegreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- John A. BurgessHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfredo B. D. SilvaMorrison & Foerster | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Bret M. DiMarcoWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| David J. SegreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| John A. BurgessHALE AND DORR | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.75 |