CINEMARK INC
CIK 1173463Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.21 | 0.52 | 1.16 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Haynes and Boone | May 2002 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.86 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry M. SchpokAkin Gump | May 2002 | Text search only | 12 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 |