CenterStaging Corp. CNSC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1172939Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- TroyGould PCFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Derenthal & Dannhauser LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.23× · Went dark 2.91× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| TroyGould PC | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 125 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.25 |
| Derenthal & Dannhauser LLP | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.23 | 2.91 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Darrin M. OcasioSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Alan B. SpatzTroyGould PCFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 2.15× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Paul J. DerenthalDerenthal & Dannhauser LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 2.95× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- KENNETH G. EADEFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.44× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darrin M. OcasioSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.16 | 1.72 | 1.16 |
| Alan B. SpatzTroyGould PC | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.03 | 2.15 | 1.18 |
| Paul J. DerenthalDerenthal & Dannhauser LLP | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.37 | 2.95 | 0.00 |
| KENNETH G. EADE | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 33 | 1.65 | 1.44 | 0.83 |