REGAL CINEMAS CORP
CIK 1172371Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Bradley Arant Boult CummingsFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Day Pitney LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Bradley Arant Rose & WhiteFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Burr & FormanFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- HASKELL SLAUGHTER & YOUNGFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Bradley Arant Boult Cummings | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Day Pitney LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
| Hogan & Hartson | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Bradley Arant Rose & White | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 32 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Burr & Forman | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 45 | 0.00 | 0.45 | 0.80 |
| HASKELL SLAUGHTER & YOUNG | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 25 | 0.97 | 1.85 | 0.63 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2002 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard J. MatteraHogan & HartsonFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher J. WalshHogan & HartsonFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Whitney HolmesHogan & HartsonFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Steven A. CohenWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard J. MatteraHogan & Hartson | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher J. WalshHogan & Hartson | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| Whitney HolmesHogan & Hartson | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Steven A. CohenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2002 | Text search only | 23 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.73 |