MONDAY LTD
CIK 1172241Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 245 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Allen & Overy | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 245 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 0.62 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.30 |
| Davis Polk | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kenneth A. LefkowitzHughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Luciana FatoCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James C. WooleryCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth A. LefkowitzHughes Hubbard & Reed | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Luciana FatoCravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James C. WooleryCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2002 | Text search only | 8 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.63 |