BILL BARRETT CORP BBG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1172139Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Jun 2008 to Feb 2016
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Faegre & Benson | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| Akin Gump | Jul 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| King & Spalding | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Patton Boggs | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Baker & Daniels | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John ElofsonDavis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Douglas R. WrightFaegre & BensonFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Jason DayPerkins CoieFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Lloyd H. SpencerNixon PeabodyFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Alan L. TalesnickPatton BoggsFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Christine B. LaFolletteAkin GumpFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Mark ZvonkovicAkin GumpFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John ElofsonDavis Graham & Stubbs | Feb 2015 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Douglas R. WrightFaegre & Benson | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.75 | 1.55 | 1.30 |
| Jason DayPerkins Coie | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.53 | 0.98 | 1.00 |
| Lloyd H. SpencerNixon Peabody | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 1.47 |
| Alan L. TalesnickPatton Boggs | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 1.28 |
| Christine B. LaFolletteAkin Gump | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Mark ZvonkovicAkin Gump | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.64 | 0.20 | 1.96 |