US GEOTHERMAL INC HTM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1172136Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jun 2008 to Feb 2016
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Williams Kastner & GibbsFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- McCullough O Connor IrwinFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 2.54× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodmans LLP | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Jul 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Williams Kastner & Gibbs | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.68 | 1.71 | 1.02 |
| Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 78 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Stoel Rives | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| McCullough O Connor Irwin | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 13 | 1.12 | 2.54 | 1.83 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kimberley AndersonDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Christopher J. BarryDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimberley AndersonDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Christopher J. BarryDorsey & Whitney LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 2.10 |