CIT GROUP INC CIT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1171825Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Smith AndersonFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Anderson | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Proskauer Rose | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sidley Austin | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| HALE AND DORR | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David B. HarmsSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John E. EstesSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Andrea S. RattnerProskauer RoseFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Martha E. McGarrySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrea L. NicolasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Abigail ArmsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Linda E. RappaportShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 6.86×
- Michael J. SchiavoneShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Rohan S. WeerasingheShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Andre WeissSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David B. HarmsSullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John E. EstesSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Andrea S. RattnerProskauer Rose | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Martha E. McGarrySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrea L. NicolasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Abigail ArmsShearman & Sterling | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Linda E. RappaportShearman & Sterling | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 6.86 |
| Michael J. SchiavoneShearman & Sterling | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Rohan S. WeerasingheShearman & Sterling | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Andre WeissSchulte Roth & Zabel | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 2.44 |