BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP INC BKRS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1171032Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Oct 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2006 to Oct 2013
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Arnall Golden GregoryFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Brown & AssociatesFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Cave | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Arnall Golden Gregory | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 60 | 0.66 | 1.11 | 1.13 |
| Brown & Associates | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 19 | 1.19 | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Thompson Coburn | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William L. ColeBryan CaveFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
- GARY EPSTEINGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- J. Mark KlamerBryan CaveFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- James R. LeveyBryan CaveFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Gerald L. BaxterGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.89×
- John D. HogoboomLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- John L. SullivanVenable LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 2.24× · 95% wipeout 3.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William L. ColeBryan Cave | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.28 |
| GARY EPSTEINGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.87 | 0.63 | 1.32 |
| J. Mark KlamerBryan Cave | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| James R. LeveyBryan Cave | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Gerald L. BaxterGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.89 |
| John D. HogoboomLowenstein Sandler | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 49 | 0.59 | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| John L. SullivanVenable LLP | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 12 | 0.73 | 2.24 | 3.47 |