COSI INC COSI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1171014Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| DLA Piper | May 2005 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | May 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Brown & Wood | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Sidley Austin | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis J. BlockCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Larry A. BardenSidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Morton A. PierceDewey BallantineFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- William P. MillsCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis J. BlockCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Aug 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.46 | 0.73 | 1.23 |
| Larry A. BardenSidley Austin | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| Morton A. PierceDewey Ballantine | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.94 | 0.40 | 0.34 |
| William P. MillsCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.67 |