Uni-Pixel UNXL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1171012Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Sep 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Sep 2016 to Sep 2017
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Crowell & MoringFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Winstead PCFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crowell & Moring | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 59 | 1.69 | 2.10 | 1.49 |
| Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 67 | 2.28 | 1.77 | 1.64 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Jones Walker | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Winstead PC | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Blake BaronMitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.13× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 2.35×
- Kevin FriedmannRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Scott D. ChenevertJones WalkerFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 2.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA Piper | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.05 | 1.34 | 1.26 |
| Blake BaronMitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 24 | 2.13 | 2.49 | 2.35 |
| Kevin FriedmannRichardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.80 | 1.73 | 2.22 |
| Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.36 | 2.18 | 1.61 |
| Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.72 |
| Scott D. ChenevertJones Walker | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.96 | 1.73 | 2.73 |